In the aftermath of 9/11 America the culture of post-September 11 America is now a battlefield for conflicting ideas as New York City is precariously placed as the epicenter of it all, Islamic art is in trend once again. But this time, it’s not the tangled world of definition-defying contemporary art that is claimed to be an unfathomable glimpse into the souls of Muslims and their followers, but Islamic arts in their historical sense. It is the design and the art of architecture which developed over the course of centuries of dynastic control across West, Central, and South Asia, across the Mediterranean and then down to North as well as Sub-Saharan Africa (although not necessarily in the same order). The period of time that is typically covered by the heading “Islamic art” began in the 7th century, with the first formalization of Muslim societies in the time of the Prophet Mohammad’s successors and concludes with the collapse of the Ottoman Empire amidst its demise in the First World War. Although it has been examined in relation to the fall and rise of Islamic rule across a wide geographic region, a clear concept for “Islamic art” is not clear even among scholars of the present.
It is in this setting in this context that The Metropolitan Museum of Art has restored and renamed its galleries to showcase Islamic art, with the heading: Art of the Arab Lands, Turkey, Iran, Central Asia and Later South Asia. It was shut down shortly before the American invasion of Iraq in 2003 (although it is believed that the timing was not coincidental) The Met has spent the last eight years , and forty million dollars rehabilitating and expanding its galleries. In this time, the department that houses the museum’s collection of Islamic art is believed to have conducted research, restored a number of pieces and revised the curatorial approach that 1,200 of its 12,000 works are exhibited for the general public. As a result, the department claims that it’s responding to an influx of academic research that is beginning reconsider Islamic art and its history.
Highlights from this huge collection are divided into 15 galleries that are arranged according, at least in part, to contemporary current geography, with a focus on specific regions to which Islam expanded under the Caliphates. However, this doesn’t mean that it will differ from the standard ways that Islamic art is studied in Western academic circles despite the Met’s assertion the new gallery will be examining the current debates surrounding the issue. Each gallery displays artworks or objects that bear the hallmarks of of the most popular forms and styles that developed from the aesthetics of Islamic art influenced specific regions during the period of 13 centuries. In certain instances, such as in the gallery showing Ottoman art of the Ottoman period (1299-1923) ceramics textiles, calligraphic and textile works are a visual record of the evolution and change of designs as they influenced local cultural practices. Some, like the galleries dedicated to Mamluk Egypt or Syria (1250-1517) the galleries concentration on one particular type of object or material which is in this instance the gilded and enameled glass lamps utilized to create striking effects in interiors, strangely, it is a precedent for objects that could be a sign of larger achievements in the historical context of aesthetics, for instance, the evolution of architecture in an urban environment, where exteriors were integrated into the landscape of culture.
The galleries are arranged slightly chronologically (periods and regions often be overlapping due to passing of styles, techniques or even the work of artisans in rival periods of dynasties) Visitors have choice of accessing the permanent exhibit via several access points and even the museum’s area that focuses on the 19th century European painting. The concept is that each space is stocked with enough to offer a range of Islamic art’s fundamental characteristics. These types are typically described as comprising calligraphy, geometric design and highly stylized representations of fauna and flora. Architecture and the distinction of secular and sacred spaces by the arrangement and the ornamentation of buildings is also crucial, since the construction of buildings is often relied on the visual energy of the writing word, the geometric abstract and patterns of the vegetal. In the galleries that exhibit Art of the Arab Lands, Turkey, Iran, Central Asia, and Later South Asia the particulars are displayed under a broad classification in where art is frequently combined with visual culture, and there is a lack of distinction between objects that are functional and works of art. This leads to the question that is omnipresent: what exactly is Islamic art?
If we follow the conventional logic of art history, where aesthetics can be defined by the visual elements that emerged within the geographical or social boundaries of a specific cultural context at the time and the first stage of the process of defining Islamic art is to determine how the aesthetic developed in the first initial place. What are the essential elements that make up Islamic art? What does it mean? What are the reasons behind this? any other visual artifact can Islamic art make use of representation? What are the intentions of this representation, and how can it be targeted towards the audience? The next set of questions could explore the evolution of this style across space and time as a method of communication or expression of creativity. What was the way Islamic art employed? What social impact was it able to have once it was beginning to gain traction? How did it evolve in time? Who was the main factors behind these changes, and how?
A large part of the current debate about what falls within the realm of Islamic art is based on the fact that a lot of these questions remain to ponder by the very institutions that are positioned as guardians of this information. The art world has finally become global and new art centres in cities such as Hong Kong and Dubai redirecting the spotlight of the art market an emphasis is being put on the contemporary art scene beyond the traditional borders in the West. This is, in turn, an expansion and revision of the previous research, since the majority of the progress in Western the study of art has been influenced by the need for information that arises when art is considered an object of trade. It is all to do with government policies and foreign policy, to be precise. Many critical comments have been made in the last decade regarding the motivations, implications and the packaging of this interest, revealing what it actually is. But one of the most significant results from this shift in discussion is that precisely the subject matter being meticulously studied are starting to speak up and assert their voices in the new definition of scholarship. This has proved to be detrimental to the Euro-American tradition of art history as the dominant notions are being examined.
In a conference held in Amsterdam in the spring of this year, historians, curators and art historians were offered the opportunity to think about and discuss the benefits of showing Islamic Art in the Netherlands to educate the Dutch public about Islam and its role in modern culture. The purpose of “Presenting the ‘Islamic’ Arts in a Modern Context,” which was held through Messis Foundation Messis Foundation, was to discuss ways that galleries and museums could facilitate the display of “art of Islamic culture” to the contemporary audience. At the start this conference that comprised talks of curators and experts from museums such as museums like the British Museum, the Victoria and Albert Museum and the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the focus of discussion was the first step of defining a precise description that would define Islamic art. Since this was a source of contention among a variety of experts in different aspects of the field including the non-profit sector of culture to the most prestigious international institutions, it revealed the actual conflict between the current ways of looking at representation of culture and art, as well as the numerous outdated methods of art and history. One of the main themes at the event was that of having to study and explain the fundamentals of Islamic art.
Utilizing the Met’s new galleries as a reference point is it possible to grasp Islamic art as an acceptable aesthetic within a historical context using these lenses of institutionalization? An examination of the way in which the objects and artworks are displayed will help us understand the perspective of the Museum’s Islamic art division has designed this new installation.
As an example, a prelude of this Safavid (1501-1722) type of architectural style by in which this Iranian city Isfahan is famous is illustrated by a striking 14th century mihrab found in The Madrasa Imami. The mihrab is decorated in white and blue polychrome-glazed tiles, its intricate arabesques and evocative muhaqqaq kufic and the thuluth scripts serve as focal points of direction. Since every square inch of the mihrab is decorated with intricate designs geometric patterns complement the flowing curvatures and lines of Quranic inscriptions as well as excerpts taken from hadith (the Prophet’s words). The harmonious arrangement offers an excellent illustration of the way Islamic art was designed to instill an awe-inspiring feeling in both believers and non-believers and visually reaffirming the vast awe and wonder of nature as evidence of the beauty of God. The use of vegetation could be understood as a reminder of the promise of paradise , which is outlined in the inscription that is placed around the niche’s semicircle. In the galleries of the Met, the mihrab is featured as the main piece of the permanent exhibit and stands stylistically in opposition to the works made during the times in Moorish Spain (711-1492) in addition to in the Ottoman Empire that are exhibited in adjacent rooms. The mihrab is distinct in its mood, color in design, style, and form in comparison to it’s counterparts, the Iznik ceramics and Moroccan courtyards that are located only a few steps away. It is a compositional mess, but the outer border and central arch are in close conversation with the book art and weaving art which are also on display nearby.
When shopping for Islamic art see here.
If this kind of visual continuity is apparent in the department’s art and objects , and is easily noticed by the eye it’s because it is the way it happened in the past when forms were adopted and refined by a succession of craftsmen and artists. Though beautifully presented all over, where the Met falls short is in the explanation of these works , and Islamic art in general since the galleries lack any discussion of what every visual element means in the context of aesthetics and the spirituality which influenced it.
For the discerning person, this is observed in intricate patterns that emphasise symmetry the cyclical aspect of existence, as well as the beginnings of the universe in the center of geometric forms that equidistant lines be derived and to where they will return. The intricate repetition of these forms which we see as an essential characteristic of Islamic art comes from the use of advanced math. When they expand exponentially from a single source to stunning designs, the idea of infinity has spiritual overtones. The use of calligraphy through the gradual reduction of written text to picture-like, often achieves a state of abstraction that dispenses with representation entirely, and speaks of things that are intangible like the transcendental. Although the symbolism of this was initially utilized in a context of religion but the reach of the aesthetics was swiftly expanded to include visual culture in everyday objects. This did not necessarily alter its original meaning if applied in line with its formal and symbolic qualities.
When we talk about this Islamic Golden Age (750-1258) during which philosophy, science and poetry interacted and flourished under the influence of Islam We can also examine Islamic architecture and art as concrete evidence of its contribution. The examples displayed in the Met’s galleries convey the amazing beauty in Islamic arts, without the details, the viewer is left to conclude that it was merely decorative. In its descriptions of the works and introductions to specific periods that the department focuses on, it tends to concentrate more on specific techniques like the advances created in the field of glazing ceramics and enameling glassware, as well as the specific materials employed to make objects. While workshops or artists are recognized at times but there is a lack of a greater appreciation of their artistic merit and function they could have played in advancing the aesthetic.
A common method of highlighting artworks is to highlight the patronage for which they were made. This is evident in the instances that were ordered as direct declarations of ruling dynastic power, like”Tughra of Sultan Suleyman the Magnificent “Tughra of Sultan Suleyman the Magnificent” (1555-60), that was crafted by an artist who was a employee of the Ottoman bureaucracy, and served as a type of authentic letterhead to signify documents. Thus, even though the structure of galleries based on areas and dynasties could have significance for locating artworks within a historic context, but the main concept of this exhibition is the representation of Islamic art as a symbol of power, since patronage is more important than artistic creativity regardless of the existence of documents that show the huge degree of freedom and creativity the art and craft industry was allowed to create. The aesthetic power that is Islamic arts and their sophisticated methods of understanding the world by using abstraction are completely destroyed. What this means is that it separates it from other works and periods that are seen as significant in the overall perspective of global cultural trends. Despite the long time Islamic art spans as an ongoing movement that mirrored and sometimes intersected with international counterparts, its repute is typically reserved to European art and school. While Islamic art was acknowledged and utilized by the most renowned European modernists from the beginning of the 20th century this reductionist view of the field has endured for decades.
The Met’s gallery of Orientalist painting, which serves as the physical connection between the 19th century European painting and Islamic art, is fitting in this respect. A docent at the preview for the new galleries described the position of these Orientalist paintings as “a amazing juxtaposition.” Although the paintings of Gerome (1824-1904) as well as his contemporary artists represent the concept as the “exotic Other” from the Western viewpoint however, the museum views these paintings as significant historical documents. The actual origins of the department’s backward interpretation of Islamic art is found in paintings made in the hands of European artists who were working for several centuries prior to the time of Gerome.
Some of the earliest artifacts of Islamic art to be brought to Europe began to appear from the eleventh century. The pottery was used as decoration for Romanesque cathedrals in Italy the pottery was part of a lengthy list of highly sought-after “goods” which were traded through an extensive trade network that connected Islamic Dynasties of in the Mediterranean and their European counterparts. Since these dynasties were on the same (if not more) in terms of political power as well as their cultural domain, they drew the interest of the top the echelons in European society. Although they were occasionally employed in diplomatic exchanges, it was the creation of an industry for these items which led to a massive collector’s frenzies that was created as carpets, vessel crystals, pottery jewelry, and other metal objects became very well-known (and popular). When the demand for these “consumer products” was soaring throughout Europe and their connection to Muslim societies transformed into the appropriation of their design and their representation in European visual and artistic culture of the day. Though they were valued as belongings but what was lost in the process of transport (and possibly because of Europe’s long-standing history of ethnicity) was the real value and meaning of aesthetics. It was the Crusades (1095-1291) were able to strengthen (if not to amplify) the political aspects of this relation to Islamic art. By the time the retaking of Spain was concluded around 1492 the acquisition of these artifacts was typically considered to be a symbol of usurpation of power. This was reflected in the priceless artworks becoming part of the property that belonged to European churches.
This love affair with Islamic art continued throughout the sixteenth and seventeenth century and into the seventeenth century, when European artists often integrated artisanal techniques into their figurative compositions. Hans Holbein the Younger (1497-1543) was one of the most famous German painter who was integral in during the Northern Renissance, frequently depicted his subjects with corresponding ceramics or carpets which included ones that resemble Ottoman and Mamluk pieces that are in the collection of the Met. Nowadays, it’s not unusual for art historians or museum curators (including that of the Met) to describe some Anatolian weavings in the form of “Holbein carpets.” These works could be classified as scholars in accordance with their European artists who used the looms as still-life elements doesn’t even begin to explain the scope of the offense. There are many other instances where the most renowned works in Islamic art are described not by their apparent aesthetics or even the painter who painted the work, but rather as a reference to the famous European collector who owned them.
The Metropolitan Museum of Arts’ revamping of its galleries to exhibit Islamic art is a continuation of this complicated story. The majority of the works on display are the same kinds of “goods” that came into Western consciousness as a result of the two-sided encounters Europe was able to have to”the “Islamic world” in the midst of its dynasties. In the captions the department takes extreme care to explain what they consider to be the “lavish,” “sumptuous,” and “superb” features of these items, calling to mind the style that is “documentation” and “documentation” that has become the mainstay in the market for antiques. The truth is, little changes since the 13th century.